Skip to main content
sociable systems.
Working artifact · Demo & download

Grant Compliance & Funder Reporting Tracker

A working artifact for the teams whose funder reporting is audit-facing: government and pass-through awards, restricted funds, institutional grants where a reviewer reads the file the way an auditor would. A relational workbook with a live dashboard and guardrails, plus a local script that turns the logs into a finished funder, board, and audit-evidence pack. Free browser demo below; the kit itself is a one-time download in three tiers.

Why this exists

Grants rarely come apart at the application. They come apart at the report and the reconciliation, when a funder asks where their restricted dollars went and the answer lives across four spreadsheets and someone's memory.

Most small teams track grants on a flat list that holds the award but not the spend, or the spend but not the deliverables. When the report falls due, when the auditor lands, when a grant quietly reaches its end date with money unspent, that list cannot answer the question being asked. The work becomes an excavation rather than a query.

This kit demonstrates the architecture that makes it a query. Every expense and every report ties back to a specific award. The dashboard aggregates as you log. The guardrails fire when a report is late, when a grant is burning ahead of plan, when one is ending with funds still on the table. The companion script turns all of it into the documents a funder, a board, and an auditor each want, and discloses every place AI touched the record.

Interactive demo

Click through the tracker preview.

Below is the live tracker, populated with a sample portfolio of eight grants from foundations, a corporate funder, a donor-advised fund, and a federal pass-through. Move between the dashboard, the grant register, what the report run produces, and the line on where AI belongs.

Headline numbers — auto-updating
Active grants
7
Committed
$390,000
Spent
$180,000
46% expended
Unspent balance
$210,000
Restricted
$340,000
Unrestricted
$50,000
AI-disclosure rate
26%
of expense rows
Reports due ≤14d
4
Committed vs spent — auto-updating from the logs
Percent spent by grant
GR-001
28%
GR-002
34%
GR-003
50%
GR-004
94%
GR-005
40%
GR-006
34%
GR-007
46%
ahead of pace ending soon, unspent
Restricted vs unrestricted
  • $340,000Restricted
  • $50,000Unrestricted
Spend by budget category
Auto-Checks — what to do now
Reports overdue
1
Reports due ≤14 days
4
Spending ahead of pace
1
Clawback risk
2
Expenses missing docs
3
AI-disclosure rate
26%
Static preview, fixed to an as-of date of 2026-06-25. The live kit recomputes every number and guardrail as you log grants, expenses, and reports.

Who it's for

  • Organisations holding government or pass-through awards, where the reporting is audit-facing and the documentation trail has to survive a reviewer who does this for a living.
  • Grantees of DFIs, impact funds, and large institutional funders, who report on restricted money against terms that read like a lender's, not a thank-you note.
  • Finance leads carrying restricted funds across several funders at once, where a missed report or an unspent balance has a real, countable cost.
  • Grants consultants, fiscal sponsors, and bookkeepers running many funders' reports for many clients, who need a rigorous, reusable template rather than another login.
The compliance spine

Built around the standards your funder and your auditor read to

Every field carries its hook. Restriction maps to net-asset classification under GAAP. Budget categories and the documentation flag map to the cost principles in 2 CFR 200. The report log maps to the performance and financial reporting cadence. The portfolio totals feed the line items an IRS 990 and a year-end audit both reach for.

Where it earns its keep. For federal awards that cross the Single Audit threshold, the audit-facing build configures the schedule of expenditures, the cost-principle mapping, and the per-award evidence pack to the grant. The self-serve workbook covers the restricted-funds tracking and reporting cadence that bite every grantee carrying donor restrictions; the full Single-Audit configuration is the custom tier, not a checkbox.

Get the kit

The demo is free. The kit is a one-time download.

The preview above stays free. The kit itself is a downloadable package: the workbook, the report generator, the sample outputs, and the documents below. One purchase, no monthly bill, and the files are yours on your own machine.

Steward Core
$99

The working kit.

  • The relational workbook: grant register, expense log, report log, dashboard, guardrails, and the compliance crosswalk
  • The report generator: funder report, board summary, audit-evidence pack, budget-vs-actual, and restricted-funds schedule on a double-click
  • A sample portfolio and a full set of example outputs
  • Runs offline. AI is optional, and disclosed wherever it is used
Get Core · $99
Steward Plus
$149

Core, plus the handbook and templates.

  • Everything in Core
  • The Steward Handbook: deploying, tuning the guardrails, and working the crosswalk
  • Board-update and funder cover-letter templates
Get Plus · $149
For audit-facing grantees
Steward Pro
$199

Plus the federal readiness pack.

  • Everything in Plus
  • The federal / Single-Audit readiness pack: a 2 CFR 200 crosswalk, a SEFA schedule template, and an audit-prep checklist
  • Twelve months of updates
Get Pro · $199
Custom build

Need it configured to your funders, your report templates, and the standard your reviewers enforce? That is a custom build, scoped and priced after the portfolio is understood. Talk about a custom build →

Straight answers

The questions worth asking first

I run on a Mac and Google Workspace. Can I use this?

The workbook opens in Google Sheets, where the dashboard and guardrail formulas work. The one-click report generator is a local script, so the finished-report-pack feature is strongest on a machine where you can run it. A Sheets-native version is on the table; if that is your stack, say so when you request access and it shapes what ships.

GrantHub shut down and Grantseeker is free. Why this?

If all you need is a pipeline and deadline alerts, a free tracker is the right call and you should take it. Steward is for the part those tools leave to you: turning the logged data into the funder report, the budget-vs-actual, and the audit evidence pack without losing the weekend. Different job, further down the line.

Do I need an API key or any AI setup?

No. The whole kit runs offline. AI only drafts narrative slots if you choose to wire in a key, and every document states whether it did. The dashboard and the guardrails are pure spreadsheet.

What about federal grants and Single Audit?

The core crosswalk maps to GAAP donor-restriction classification, 2 CFR 200, and IRS 990, which covers most foundation and mixed portfolios. Federal awards that trigger a Single Audit need the dedicated Federal pack, configured to the award. That is a custom build, not the self-serve kit.

Where does my data live?

On your machine. Nothing is uploaded. For organisations with government-adjacent funders or data-residency obligations, that is the point. For everyone else, it is simply one less account to breach.

What it's not
  • Not cloud collaborative software. If you need real-time multi-user editing and a mobile app, a hosted platform is the honest answer, not this.
  • Not necessary below about five concurrent grants. If you run two or three, a clean free template and a shared calendar genuinely outperform any tool. Come back when the portfolio bites.
  • Not a Single Audit substitute. For federal awards over the Single Audit threshold, this organises the evidence; it does not replace the audit or the dedicated Federal pack.
  • Not an AI product. It is a workbook with a reporting engine, and AI is bolted on only where it earns its place, disclosed every time.
Custom builds

For a federal portfolio, a consultant managing many clients, or a funder mix that needs its own crosswalk, the kit becomes a custom build.

Same engine, configured to your awards, your report templates, and the standard your reviewers enforce. Scope and price are confirmed after the portfolio is understood.

Talk about a custom build →
Back to the library.